Timetable period heading in graphic timetable viewer (de: Fahrplanperiode als Überschrift im Bildfahrplan)

In some cases additionally to the train heading (see #38 (closed)) a head line showing the current timetable period in the graphic timetable view is available.

Moved here from #36 (closed) (Handling and displaying operating periods): "Optionally displaying as heading in the graphical timetable viewer".

1. Take the chosen train. Additionally other trains will be visualized, but not considered for the heading.
2. Take the first trainPart[@id = train/trainPartSequence[1]/trainPartRef[1]/@ref]
3. Take the referred timetablePeriod[@id = trainPart/@timetablePeriodRef] if available
4. Otherwise (@timetablePeriodRef is absent) leave this line blank
5. Show timetablePeriod/@name if available
6. Otherwise show timetablePeriod/@description if available
7. Otherwise show timetablePeriod/@startDate and timetablePeriod/@endDate if available

At the railML-timetable-workgroup-meeting (2015-03-16, Vienna) other developers proposed to discard timetablePeriod/@name and timetablePeriod/@description because of free text input by the software user.

See also #38 (closed) (for train/@name and train/@description)

Should the same behaviour be implemented? That would mean only 7th item of the list above.

By Deleted User on 2015-03-25T16:50:15 (imported from GitLab)

The same topic for operatingPeriod/@name, operatingPeriod/@code and operatingPeriod/@description.

By Deleted User on 2015-03-25T17:01:08 (imported from GitLab)

• Milestone changed from %"4. Meeting" to %"next meeting"

By Deleted User on 2015-04-09T11:17:09 (imported from GitLab)

• Milestone changed from %"next meeting" to %"Productive version (V1.0)"

By Deleted User on 2015-05-07T13:53:43 (imported from GitLab)

agreed on project meeting (2015-05-07): for graphic timetable view the same header (timetable period) have to be used like the tabular view

By Deleted User on 2015-05-07T17:51:51 (imported from GitLab)

• Owner set to @deleted-user
• Status changed from new to assigned

By Deleted User on 2015-05-07T17:52:17 (imported from GitLab)

• Milestone %"Productive version (V1.0)" deleted

• Version changed from 1.0 to 1.1

• headers don't contain timetable periode so far

• a special logic is necessary to fit all possible versions to give timetable periods in the file together --> some algorithm are needed

• in case a consolidated periode is defined, it is not obvious what rules should be implemented to show correct views

• so far, that can not be solved during version 1.0

By Deleted User on 2015-06-04T14:49:02 (imported from GitLab)

• Version changed from 1.1 to 1.2

By Deleted User on 2016-05-22T14:30:43 (imported from GitLab)

• Owner set to @deleted-user
• Priority changed from normal to minor

By Coordination on 2017-02-26T20:53:49 (imported from GitLab)

• Owner set to @deleted-user

By Deleted User on 2017-03-19T14:14:56 (imported from GitLab)

In [changeset:"733/railML-viewer"]:

see #42 and #43

By Deleted User on 2017-05-28T15:19:53 (imported from GitLab)

mentioned in commit b78caf3a

By TT Coordination on 2021-12-15T16:09:06 (imported from GitLab)

changed the description

changed milestone to %2.1

removed 1.0 label

removed 1.1 label

removed 1.2 label

added 2.x label

removed normal label